The Real “Weapon Of Mass Destruction” They Want To Make You Think Is A “Conspiracy Theory”

A recent study took place in the “chemtrail” phenomenon. “was picked up by several alternative media and in accordance with Huffington post , the study authors believe that this is the first peer-reviewed scientific paper that evaluates the claims made for many, and offers proof that most scientists in real life simply are not buying their theories. But this is simply not the case, there are many who actually do not buy, and have examined the evidence and reach a conclusion that never appeared in the mainstream.

researchers say a 2011 study revealed almost unbeatable 17 percent of respondents believed that it was at least partly true that the stripes in the sky left by the planes are actually attempts by the government in secret to spray harmful chemicals into the atmosphere.

The following segments have written several articles on the subject that these mainstream media never mention are presented. In the end, a couple of documentaries seemed to illustrate why many people these programs are operational reality.

A couple of months, HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud, humanitarian and daughter of King Saud, compared science and programs to weapons of mass destruction geoengineering, arguing that its application is like putting a pump without nuclear explosion.

She also stressed that geoengineering threatens the supply of water and food in the world and is one of the keys to the “new energy” in the world. She also emphasized that the people behind these programs have a lot of resources at their disposal, but they are playing a very dangerous game with the balance of the planet through geoengineering, and this is a method of “slow poisoning.”

This occurred at the Security Conference in Istanbul on December 5, 2015, where he gave a speech on “global justice and ethics in the changing world order.”

you can see the full interview he did with Patrick Roddie below:

More on geoengineering

“in recent years there has been a decline in support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly to operational projects.” – World Meteorological Association ( source )

For those of you who do not know, geoengineering is the deliberate intervention and large-scale climate system of the Earth. This is done through various means, one of which is spraying chemicals into the atmosphere through the planes. Weather modification actually dates back to the 1940s, when the General Electric Company showed that a cloud of supercooled droplets of water could become ice crystals when planted with dry ice. Shortly after this, it was discovered that fine particles of silver iodide pure, with a similar crystal structure ice, could be effectively used for modifying the global climate.

The Hughes Aircraft Company even has a patent dating more than twenty years ago, in 1990. You can take a look at it here . It contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide, thorium oxide, and refractory Welsbach.

Fast forward to today, with even more chemicals added to the mix, and it becomes clear why so many people are concerned about these initiatives. Since its inception in the 1940s, geoengineering programs have become increasingly ubiquitous, appearing in several universities around the world. The debate still continues about whether these programs are operational reality, however, but for anyone who has done the research, which is quite easy to see the truth of the matter. According to M. Granger Morgan, University and Professor Lord of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University:

I want to reiterate what John said, it is believe any research in this area must be open. I think it would be really disastrous if, you know, we have discovered a few years from now that there was a “black program” that a government had been prior to a kind of learning in the position of calm how to do this. . . .

we do things in the stratosphere all the time, of course, and what is not as if the stratosphere is absolutely pristine. But you do not want to have people go out and do things that require large radiative forcing; or continue for long periods of time; or, for that matter, provide plenty of reactive surfaces that could result in significant destruction of ozone. ( source )

If you look at SPICE , a research project geoengineering government funded United Kingdom, working with the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh and Bristol, some of the proposals particles to spray in the air include:

  • sulfate / sulfuric dioxide / sulfur acid
  • Titania
  • silicon carbide
  • calcium carbonate
  • alumina
  • silica
  • zinc oxide

refer to it as Solar Radiation Management, and the idea is to spray these chemicals in the atmosphere in order to combat the effects of global warming diverting them off the surface of the Earth.

Geoengineering has also been used for more mundane purposes, such as to change the climate in China during the Olympic Games of 2008. ( source ) This, to me, seems as an extremely irresponsible use of technology.


is also important to mention that these programs seem to be under the control of federal agencies. This means that if in fact things are fumigating the atmosphere, never hear about it, because it would fall into the category of “national security” – a term used to justify the classification of millions of pages of documents each year.

The CIA and NASA are certainly support the National Academy of Sciences in regard to geoengineering projects. This is very clear in a document of the US government printed States at the request of the US Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in November 1978

in addition to the specific programs of research sponsored by federal agencies, other functions related to weather modification that takes place in several places in the executive branch. Several panels and federal advisory committees and staff -Established to conduct in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports to provide advice or recommendations to coordinate federal programs weather modification – they have hosted and supported within executive departments, agencies or offices.

I must also mention that not just the princess who is speaking against these programs. Concerns are being expressed for years by several individuals around the world. For example, Rosalind Peterson, President and Co-Founder of the Coalition for Agriculture (ADC) and a State Department former United of Agriculture (USDA) employee, made this statement at a hearing of the United Nations on global warming 2007:

One of the things that are affected by climate change is agriculture, but some of what we are seeing is made by man, but man made a differently than you might guess. weather modification programs, experimental carried out by private companies, made by the US government, made by the states in the United States, are underway; more than 50 of them in operation throughout the United States. All these effects agriculture because they change the micro-climate necessary for agriculture to survive. None of these programs that I know, and today this public register of all, are available at any time with supervision. . . . International corporations are changing our climate at all times, and are changing it so that cover thousands of square miles. Most are chemically modified, so what happens is that we are putting chemicals, land-based chemicals that are thrown in the air, or chemicals from airplanes, to change and modify our climate.

read more, and see the full hearing here .

A 1996 report by top military personnel in the US, entitled “Time as a force multiplier; Possess time in 2025,” reveals the supposed urgency of putting these programs into practice:

current demographic, economic and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups of convert this capability weather modification in capacity.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue a policy of this type, depending on its interests, at various levels.

Dr. Marvin Herndon, PhD, a nuclear, chemical geochemical and cosmochemical -. Best known to deduce the composition of the inner core of the Earth (being nickel silicide instead of partially crystallized metal nickel-iron) – has published a pioneering work in the journal peer -reviewed Current Science (Indian Academy of Sciences) entitled “aluminum poisoning humanity and biota of the Earth by the activity of clandestine geoengineering: implications for India” , which shows how dangerous geoengineering is for health humans and the environment. The summary is as follows:

In response to an urgent call through an article in Current Science of assistance to understand the geological association of high mobility aluminum with human health Ganges floodplain, I describe evidence of clandestine geoengineering activity has occurred for at least 15 years, which has increased dramatically over the past two years. Geoengineering activity through tanker aircraft jet emplaces unnatural, toxic substance in the atmosphere of Earth with rain water releases large aluminum mobility. I also present evidence that the substance is toxic fly ash from coal combustion. clandestine dispersion of coal fly ash and aluminum resulting release of high mobility, posit, is an underlying cause of widespread and pronounced increase in neurological diseases as well as weakening and currently widespread and growing of the biota of the Earth. Recommendations are made to verify the evidence presented here it is applicable to the Ganga alluvial plain. ( source ) ( source )

The paper will discuss and cite publications that have been detected heavy metals such as aluminum, barium and strontium in rainwater, fly ash, and more. During the period between July 2011 and November 2012, for example, 73 rainwater samples were collected and analyzed for aluminum and barium; 71 were obtained from 60 different locations in Germany, 1 in France and 1 in Austria. aluminum was detected in 77% of samples of rainwater, and concentrations of barium and strontium were also very high.

DR. Rose Cairns, PhD, belonging to the University of Leeds Earth and Environment, published an article in the peer-reviewed journal Geophysical Journal entitled “ climate of suspicion: ‘chemtrails’ narratives of conspiracy and international politics of geoengineering “ She is also conducting research on the governance of geoengineering as part of a project of multidisciplinary collaboration between the University of Sussex, UCL and the University of Oxford ( http: // geoengineering- .). The project analyzes the social, ethical and political implications of climate geoengineering proposals. ( source )

In his article, which describes the evolution of the mainstream of academic and political discourse on geoengineering, and how weather modification, also discussed by the citizens of world (using the term “chemtrails”), is having devastating ecological and health effects worldwide. According to the paper:

Understanding the emerging politics of geoengineering, and take seriously the complaints regarding the importance of public participation, requires an understanding of all the discursive landscape around ideas of global climate control – including marginal ideas, such as those held by activists of chemtrails. Ignoring or dismissing these speeches hands as pathological or paranoid is ignoring potentially reveal views on the emerging politics of geoengineering. ( source )

She will write her “analysis suggests a number of ways in which the narrative chemtrails may contain important information and implications for the emerging politics of geoengineering that can not be dismissed out of hand as” paranoid “or” pathological. ” ( source )

As you can see, this issue is far from being a conspiracy theory. Geoengineering has the attention concerned many important people and reported worldwide, and the princess is just one of many to which we can refer. Given the political circles that she is aware, I think it’s safe to assume he knows a thing or two that goes beyond their own research on the subject

Thanks for reading, and feel free to leave some feedback in the comments section

additional resources where you can find more information..

what in the world what are spraying? (whole body)

[19459050it] Why in the world are spraying (whole body)


obtained from the National Archives. A US government document printed States at the request of the US Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in November 1978.

(1) https: //

is obtained from the archives of NASA, a paper prepared for the Interdepartmental Committee on Science Atmosphere. Prepared by Homer E. Newell to math teacher and author who became a powerful government of the United States by the administrator, finally, science reaching the number three position in the National Aeronautics and Space administration (NASA) in early 1960. 19680002906_1968002906.pdf

a history of weather modification programs prepared by Dr. Vermeeren, a professor at Delft University of Technology, faculty of industrial design engineering. It is a 300-page scientific report entitled, “Case Orange :. Contrail Science, its impact on climate programs and manipulation conducted by the US and its allies time” was prepared for Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. He was sent to embassies, news agencies and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”


in 2009, researchers published “Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” which proposes two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metal to silica and the same power stay of one to two weeks. The report notes that “proposed by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 scenario is identical to the claims” in US Patent Hughes Aircraft 1991. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a contractor of private defense in 1997, “the same company which acquired the electronic systems and the HAARP contract. ”

The above reference to the patent makes it links within the article.

David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research Letters Vol 4 No. 4 30 October 2009. Available by subscription. http: // IOPscience / 1748-9326 / 4/4/045 102

A 1996 report by top military personnel in the US, “time as a force multiplier: Owning the weather in 2025 “to test details (such as government schedules spraying, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support their notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.”


in 2007, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published a statement that included “Guidelines for Planning time modification activities.” Recognizing that modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, is still “an emerging technology.”

(4) /pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf

What can we do?

At this point, awareness is the key, and it seems to be working. More people in positions of influence are expressing concern, and members of parliament are slowly becoming aware of this problem. From now on, the best thing to do in your life is simply to share this information, and develop healthy habits. If you are concerned about the potential health hazards caused by aerial spraying, which is a great idea to strengthen your immune system with healthy foods and exercise, the body is really amazing in detoxifying itself and adaptation. Fear is useless, and it’s something I’ve been through have been researching various topics for many years, but when I get over and see the bigger picture, it’s really a great feeling.

You May Also Like:

Add a Comment

==[Click 2x to Close X]==
Most Popular Today!