Prescription Drugs Are Killing Us – Meet One Doctor (Out Of Many) Who Just Published A Paper About It

When it comes to our health, speaking of a person as a doctrine could not be the best idea, whether or not a doctor. What a person really believes that is the best course of action in the treatment of a disease may be the last thing someone recommended, depending on a complex set of factors, including where and how they were raised, and in particular, which funded The education . In fact, many have raised concerns about the use of pharmaceutical products accepted by the industry, often by the same doctors who were told to use them. Now we, on the other hand, an overwhelming amount of evidence to corroborate what many of these professionals have been trying to tell us for decades:

advertising – more

The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. Academic institutions in this country are allowing themselves as paid agents of pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s a shame.

Arnold Relman Seymour (1923-2014), professor of medicine at Harvard and former editor in chief of New England Medical Journal ( source ) ( source )

There is a reason why the article most widely visited in the history of the Library public Science (PLoS) is entitled Why most published results of the investigation are false . In the report, the researchers noted that most research findings published today are false, and this was more than 10 years.

Dr. Peter Gotzsche, co-founder of the Cochrane Collaboration (main world largest organ in the evaluation of medical evidence), expects to make clear this same problem. We are currently working to inform the world about the dangers associated with various pharmaceutical grade drugs. Based on their research, it estimates that 100,000 people in the United States alone die every year from the side effects of prescription medications used properly, noting that “It is remarkable that no one raises an eyebrow when we kill many of our citizens the drugs “. published many papers arguing that the use of antidepressants is causing more harm than good, and taking into account the losses of the past in relation to antidepressant drugs, it seems that it is correct.

According to Dr. Gotzsche:

evolve your inbox and stay conscious daily

Inspiration and all our best content directly to your inbox.

the main reason why we took so many drugs is that drug companies don t sell drugs, sell lies about drugs. This is what makes drugs differently than anything else in life … Almost everything we know about drugs is what companies have chosen us and our doctors tell patients … reason They trust their medicine is that extrapolate the confidence they have in their doctors in prescribing drugs.

Patients do not realize that, despite their doctors can know a lot about diseases and physiology and human psychology, know very, very little about drugs that have not been carefully concocted and dresses for the pharmaceutical industry … If you do not think that the system is out of control, please contact me and explain why drugs are the third leading cause of death … If an epidemic of such highly lethal it had been caused by a new virus or bacteria or even a hundredth part of it, I would have done everything possible to bring it under control. “(Taken from video below)

The most recent example of this type of corruption in connection with antidepressants comes a study published last week in the British Medical Journal by researchers at the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen. the study showed that pharmaceutical companies were not disclosing any information about the results of their drug testing

[This study] confirms that the full extent of the damage of antidepressants was not reported they are not reported in the published literature, we know that – and it seems that they are not properly reported in study reports. clinicians will regulators and from the base of decisions on licensing. ( source )

the researchers analyzed records from 70 different assays double blind, placebo-controlled selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective reuptake inhibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine (SNRI) and found that the full extent of serious damage reports from clinical studies were not reported . These are the reports sent to major health authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration US ..

Tamang Sharma, a doctoral student in Cochrane and lead author of the study, said:

We found that many of the appendices were often available only at the request of the authorities, and the authorities had not requested. I’m actually a little scary how bad the actual situation would be if we had complete data. ( source )

This is not the first time that pharmaceutical companies have been caught manipulating science in order to get antidepressants on the shelves. It was only a couple of months that an independent review found that the commonly prescribed antidepressant drug Paxil (paroxetine) is not safe for teenagers, even though a lot of literature had previously suggested this. The 2001 drug trial, which was conducted, funded by GlaxoSmithKline, it was found that these drugs were completely safe, and used that “science” to market Paxil as safe for adolescents.

Gotzche two main areas of attention are antidepressants and “non-steroidal anti-inflammatory” painkillers, such as ibuprofen, Tylenol, celecoxib, and diclofenac. There is another Vioxx, which actually was withdrawn after it was discovered that caused more than 100,000 cases of severe heart disease in the United States during the five years he was in the market.

According to Gotzche, these deaths are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the failure of the process of drug regulation to protect patients

These terms for our drugs are invented by the pharmaceutical industry. They had a significant financial interest in calling these inflammatory things. I was attracted doctors in the belief that these drugs somehow also had an effect on the disease process and reduced joint damage.

In its document also states that antidepressants have replaced the drugs that are considered harmful, such as Valium and Xanax, but they are so addictive and so dangerous side effects.

According to Professor Gotzsche , here’s a list of things you want to avoid:

  • Antidepressants for everyone as it probably will not work for cases severe depression
  • All cerebro-active drugs in children
  • antipsychotics and other drugs with the active brain for seniors. Psychotropic drugs should be used as little as possible and especially in very serious situations, as they are very harmful when used long term
  • nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used for arthritis, muscle pain and headaches, including over-the-counter, I ibuprofen low dose. These drugs should be used sparingly
  • mammography because it does not prolong life while experiencing many healthy women patients through more diagnostic and leads to the premature death of some because radiotherapy and chemotherapy increases mortality when used for cancers detected in screening harmless.
  • drugs for urinary incontinence, because it is very likely not work

“The case against science is simple: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, it can be simply untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, small effects, invalid exploratory analyzes, and blatant conflicts of interest, along with an obsession with the pursuit of fashion trends of dubious importance , science has turned into darkness “ -. Dr. Richard Horton, the current Editor in Chief Lancet ( source )

Here is a great video that I share in most of my articles that have to do with this topic. It is a clip of Dr. Peter Rost, a former vice president of Pfizer and the pharmaceutical industry informant. Author of “The Whistleblower, Confessions of a hired murderer Health,” Rost is an expert on insider large pharmaceutical marketing.

Add a Comment

==[Click 2x to Close X]==
Most Popular Today!

Sorry. No data so far.