Nearly 13,000 chemicals are used in cosmetics, of which it is estimated that only 10 percent have been evaluated by safety. Many do not realize that cosmetics can be brought to market without having to undergo an approval process.
cosmetics are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration US (FDA) FDA but are not approved. This means that only after a product is considered harmful, adulterated or misbranded FDA regulatory action.The only cosmetic ingredients that require premarket approval from the FDA are taken are color additives.
So who is responsible for ensuring cosmetics and personal care products are safe? The answer is the companies that manufacture and market products. It is a classic example of the fox guarding the henhouse, which puts us all at risk.
Not only FDA regulations do not require specific tests to demonstrate the safety, but also companies are not required to share all the safety information they may have with the FDA. This raises an obvious conflict of interest, and as recent lawsuits show, this can have serious consequences for public health.
Baby Talcum Powder increases the risk of women with ovarian cancer
Johnson & Johnson (J & J) is a “friend of the child” known and trusted brand, production a range of products for babies and feminine hygiene articles. Unfortunately, J & J has failed the public trust again. And the lack of regulations on cosmetics is what helped them bury the dangers of one of its flagship products.
In 2008, he warned that women stop using talcum powder. I noticed there were several studies showing that the application of talcum powder in the genital area could raise the risk of ovarian cancer a woman if dust particles were traveling through the vagina and are embedded in their ovaries.
As noted by Robinson Calcagnie Inc., a law firm that represents victims of talcum powder, there are more than 20 such studies. Some date back to 1971, when British researchers found talc particles embedded in most ovarian tumors investigated.
While the extent of risk varies from study to study, the results suggest that women may increase their risk of ovarian cancer anywhere from 30 to 90 percent by applying talcum powder to their genital area.
A 2008 study concluded that the use of talc at least once a week increases the risk of ovarian cancer a woman by 36 percent. daily users faced an increased risk of 41 percent.
Johnson & Johnson faces legal challenges on carcinogenic Talcum Powder
According to Robinson Calcagnie:
“International Agency of the World Health Organization health for Research on Cancer [IARC] designated ‘[genital] perineal use of body talc-based powder is possibly carcinogenic to humans. ”
However, manufacturers of products containing talc, such as [J&J] and powder baby shower for shower products, have refused to recognize the link between talc and ovarian cancer and have failed [to] adequately warn consumers of the risks.
demands Now, more than 1,000 women across the country have filed against [J&J] and talc distributor Imerys, claiming the companies knew of the association between the use of talcum powder and ovarian cancer properly not even warned consumers “.
Johnson & Johnson to pay $ 72 million in damages to the victim of cancer ovary
in February 2016, a jury found talcum powder J & J had contributed to ovarian cancer 62-year-old Jacqueline Fox, Fox award of $ 72 million in damages.
Ten million dollars was awarded for damages. Another $ 62 million in punitive damages was awarded to members of his family, since he died Fox last fall, succumbing to after being diagnosed with cancer disease ovary three years ago.
Fox was delivered through a statement prerecorded, in which he said he had been using J & J talcum powder and shower shower body powder for 35 years. She is now believed that these products were responsible for killing her. Fox was the first to receive financial compensation.
Pending their day in court are another 1,200 women who, like Fox, claims J & J knew of the risks still not warned of the dangers of their products talc. A Missouri law firm was contacted by 17,000 individuals after hearing about the case of Fox, so the number of applicants is likely to increase exponentially over time.
The second defendant in the case, Imerys Talc America, has not been found to be faulty. According to jury chairman, Krista Smith, internal documents of J & J clearly they showed that the company was hiding his knowledge about the risks of the products.
“All they had to do was put a warning label on,” said Smith Bloomberg.In a statement, J & J said the verdict saying
“We have no higher than the health and safety of consumers responsibility and are disappointed with the outcome of the trial. We sympathize with the family of the plaintiff but firmly the safety of the cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence.”
J & J HID dangers of talc for 40 years
Two additional court cases have tied J & J talc to ovarian cancer. On May 2, 2016, the jury awarded Gloria Ristesund $ 55 million in damages. Ristesund, who was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2011, had used talc products J & J for 40 years.
After the hysterectomy, physicians are indeed talcum powder in the ovarian tissue. According to the Huffington Post, internal documents and notes sealed the agreement of the jurors in this case as well, demonstrating that the company “tried to cover up the tables and influence governing cosmetics.”
Talc is a magnesium trisilicate ore. In the 1970s, he was raised when talc was found to contain carcinogenic asbestos. In 1973, it was written in the law that all talcum powder should be free of asbestos.
However, the connection of ovarian cancer actually is not related to asbestos, but it is an independent risk factor. As reported by the Huffington Post:
“In 1993, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) published a study on the toxicity of talc and found a non-asbestiform clear evidence of carcinogenic activity. talc was found to be a carcinogen, with or without the presence of fibers of similar asbestos.
in response to federal study NTP , Hygiene and Cosmetics and Fragrance Association formed the working group concerned Party Talc (TIPTF). Johnson & Johnson was a member of the lobby and trade was the main actor and collaborators TIPTF.
the stated TIPTF purpose was to pool the financial resources of these companies in an effort to collectively defend talc use and to avoid regulation of any kind on this industry. “
Interestingly, Johnson & Johnson property Splenda and before writing my book sweet deception, his law firm in New York wrote me a letter of twenty pages warning me not to publish the book or that I was going to sue for tens of millions in damages. Of course I published the book and never sued me because everything he wrote was true.
But back to talc, as many other dangerous industries have made, TIPTF hired scientists to produce a biased research that is then used to give consumers a false sense of security.
This worked for several decades, but then, in 2006, the Canadian government talc classified as D2A substance within its System Hazardous Materials Information at work. D2A substances are considered “very toxic” and “cause cancer.”
That same year, the supplier talc J & J, Imerys Talc, began adding warnings to the talc sold to J & J, which provides security not only of the IARC, but also the Government of Canada .
J & J did not pass these warnings to consumers, and yet, claiming that scientific evidence supports their safety.
J & J also continues to “educate” consumers about the safety of talc on its website, without mention of having been found guilty of negligence by two different juries, or 1,200 load cases talcum powder pending contributed to ovarian cancer.
Some Talc still may be contaminated with asbestos
BASF and their lawyers also face fraud charges related to talc – in this case talc contaminated with asbestos. A class action lawsuit filed against them alleging the parties “conspired to hide and / or destroy evidence of exposure to asbestos to avoid lawsuits.”
As a result, while asbestos-containing talc is prohibited since 1973, a company called Engelhard from a mine in Vermont talc containing asbestos. Engelhard was subsequently acquired by BASF, who inherited the liabilities of the company. According to the law office Bergman Draper Ladenburg:
“officials Three Engelhard testified in depositions that there was, in fact, asbestos in the talc and officials company hid this fact. ”
J & J has a long history of embezzlement
You may be surprised to realize that J & J actually has a long history of corporate malfeasance. AllBusiness.com called J & J as one of the top 100 corporate criminals of the 1990s to destroy deliberately related to a criminal investigation of one of its products documents. In the last three years the company has invested more than $ 5 billion to pay claims related to its products.
2010 was a particularly bad year for J & J. First discovered the company hid the drug manufacturing problems, and instead to recall their defective Motrin tablets, sent undercover agents disguised as regular buyers for buy stock remaining.
That same year, the government of British Columbia, Canada, filed a lawsuit against J & J, claiming that aggressively marketed the contraceptive patch Ortho Evra without revealing serious side effects, including blood clots, pulmonary embolism, strokes, heart attacks and deep vein thrombosis. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) also accused the company of paying tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks to Omnicare Inc. to buy and recommend J & J drugs.
Investigations also revealed No more shampoo tears Baby J & J contained two potentially carcinogenic chemicals: quaternium-15, which releases formaldehyde (skin, eyes and respiratory tract, and a known carcinogen), y 1 , 4-dioxane, known to be a probable carcinogen. After several years of pressure from consumer advocates, J & J finally these dangerous ingredients from their baby shampoo eliminated in 2014.
How many Chemicals Does your beauty routine will expose?
The average American woman uses 12 personal care products and / or daily cosmetics, containing 168 different chemicals, according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG). While most men use fewer products, they are still exposed to such chemicals about 85 a day, while teenagers who use an average of 17 personal care products a day are exposed to even more.Clearly, such exposures chemicals are not insignificant, especially when they occur almost daily for life.
When teenagers EWG tested to find out which chemicals in personal care products found in their bodies, 16 different hormone-altering chemicals, including parabens and phthalates were detected. There are other chemicals are also risks.
The report “Heavy Metal Hazard: The health risks of heavy metals hidden face makeup,”
Environmental Defense tested 49 different makeup items, including foundations, concealers, powders, blushes, mascaras, eyeliners, eye shadows, lipsticks and lip glosses. Her tests revealed severe contamination by heavy metals in virtually all products:
1. 96 percent of lead contained
2. 90 percent beryllium contained
3. 61 percent thallium contained
4. 51 percent cadmium
5. 20 percent arsenic content
How to reduce chemical exposure
The GTA has a large database to help you find personal care products that are free of potentially hazardous chemicals.
Products bearing the “100% USDA Organic” seal are among its safest bets if you want to avoid potentially toxic ingredients. Please note that products account labeled “all natural” may still contain harmful chemicals, so be sure to check the list of ingredients.
Better yet, simplify your routine and make your own products. A series of lotions, potions and treatments for the hair can be removed with a jar of coconut oil, for example, which can add a high quality essential oil, if you will, of odor.
is important to remember that the skin is the largest and most permeable body. Almost anything you put on your skin will end up in the bloodstream and is distributed throughout the body. Once these chemicals find their way into your body, they tend to accumulate over time as they usually lack the necessary enzymes to break them.
When it comes to talcum powder, my recommendation is to avoid it altogether. Also remember that adult women are not the most commonly exposed to talc. Most parents generously to the bottom of your baby baby talcum powder applied in each diaper change.
A safe substitute that can absorb moisture is corn starch. In 1999, following reports of the dangers of talc, the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the National Coalition of Cancer Ovary (NOCC) came up with the recommendation to use products made from corn starch in the genital area instead of talcum powder.