Illusions simply will not deter from the fact that the cancer industry is just that: industry . Doctors, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and other key stakeholders will benefit greatly every time a cancer patient has to model conventional treatment, which usually involves injecting poisons of chemotherapy in the body, blasting with ionizing radiation or cut parts of the body – or some combination of the three Barbara.
may be that some people rub the wrong way to say this, especially those who have had to watch a loved one die of treatment conventional cancer, but each of these treatments assumptions not really work in many cases. science little known, which has made a practice of ignoring or disguising the medical-industrial complex, reveals that, despite what is often said that the medical industry, chemotherapy, in particular simply is not a treatment effective against cancer .
Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, had been studying the life expectancy of cancer patients for more than 25 years old when he came to the conclusion that, despite popular belief, chemotherapy does not work . He witnessed a large number of cancer patients treated with the poison die horrible deaths, many of them from meeting their fate long before other patients who opted for no treatment.
After further investigation, Dr. Jones found that cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy actually died faster , in most cases, than those who followed the recommendations of their doctors to get treatment. A few efforts later and Dr. Jones explains a fact that conventional cancer industry does not want the world to know about his multi-million dollar cash cow numerical data processing.
“People treatment refused lived an average of 12 years means,” said Dr. Jones about the findings of their study, which were published in the journal Proceedings of the Academy of New York Science . “Those who received other treatment lived an average of only 3 years.”
patients with breast cancer who reject all conventional therapies live four times longer than those who follow the system of
Did you see that? Rejecting conventional cancer treatments and do nothing resulted in cancer patients living more than four times longer more compliant counterparts. This is something you never hear of the media, which continues to sell the myth that cancer patients somehow need poison injected into their bodies in order to survive and reach the status of “cure”.
Dr. Jones study also found that the same is true of conventional breast cancer treatments. Women with breast cancer who refused surgery chemotherapy, radiotherapy and – and remained untreated -. Just as lived four times longer than women who went under the knife or agreed to be poisoned with chemicals
As recognized in a recent study published in the journal Clinical Oncology in 2004, chemotherapy is really only effective about 2 percent of the time for all cancers. And this is based on the criteria of survival rate five standard years, which is technically not indicative of a cure -. Although health authorities often like to say that it is
More on this is available here:
Another study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1979 he found that many of the most common procedures for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer almost all of which are still used today have done nothing to reduce the rates of breast cancer or increase the survival of patients with breast cancer.
Two other studies, one out Israel which was published in 1978 and another outside the UK which was published in The Lancet in 1980, reached similar conclusions.
“The overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the last 10 years, despite the increasing use of chemotherapy multidrug treatment of metastasis,” says study Lancet entitled “the failure of chemotherapy to prolong survival in a group of patients with metastatic breast cancer.”
“Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival first metastasis and survival may even have been shortened in some patients receiving chemotherapy. ”
treatments natural cancer are the best option if the development of this disease awful
There are solutions to treat cancer naturally, however, that do not involve just do nothing – which is still clearly better than going the conventional route. A lot of options for natural treatment of cancer are described in, a free resource that contains a lot of information about health, disease, the environment and more: The section of the site in the cure of natural cancer is available here: You can also learn more about how to treat and cure cancer naturally by visiting